Yesterday in an interview with TV A3, Mr Zapatero justified the pension reform, in particular the delay in the statutory retirement age to 67 years arguing the need to ensure access to decent pensions, similar to the present, people who now have 25 or 30 years.
wondered if the pension is to ensure that they now have 25 or 30 years and in many cases have not started to work, why reform has to affect over 45 years. Who guarantees these citizens their pension?. It appears that this population has had to guarantee the pensions of already retired and will have to do with those who are beginning to work and those that have not even done yet. It is curious that you want to review and reform the greatest extent possible the board is directly related to the quotation, the quoted time and when the citizen wants to retire, based on a minimum age that can be perfectly current 61. Why has the government of the day to decide when someone retires?. Is not it more logical for the system to recognize certain rights and that the citizen based on life expectancy decide whether to receive a pension of 1,500 Euros for 15 years or 1,260 (say) for 17 years.
you thought for a moment Mr Zapatero and his government are the reasons for this. Or maybe other reasons than for example the following:
- Waste of Public Funds.
- Duplication of authorities to provide the same service and inefficiency.
- Support and enable early retirement after 50 years in the financial sector and large companies in general.
- Allow and encourage early retirement and pensions anticipated in some bodies of public administration. Eg. The concerts in education with unions to encourage retirement at age 60.
- Allow people to relatively short trading career, less than 30 years of contribution to access pensions close to the maximum allowed, to fraudulently increase the contribution base over the last years of contributions.
- No non-contributory pension fund with taxes rather than contributions from workers.
- Allow a privileged group, Deputies, Senators and other public access to the maximum pension of racing quote just a few years.
- Encouraging general retirement at a very high percentage of citizens between 60 and 62 years without thinking about the future.
What kind of government is making only a couple of years it boasted the pension system more robust in the world and now need a reform that ultimately it aims to reduce the supply of several million citizens coming retirement and that according to the law are trading more than 30 years.?. What is proposed is not reform but a theft.
Mr Zapatero, have made the effort to understand but I'm sorry, I can not and I can not when I think of what has been your career as the ruler of the ECONOMY.
• In 2007 we had no crisis. Moreover were as UD in the Champions League.
• Until a few months ago our country was, according to UD, worthy to share the glory with 8 in the world.
• Our pensions were guaranteed.
• Our financial system was the strongest in the world, including banks are run in most cases by people without training and financial experience.
• The number of unemployed was never going to reach 4 million.
• green shoots that were visible were going to allow job creation from the beginning of 2010.
• In early 2010 sent a study to Brussels where he took as a premise for retirement at age 67. When filter media, it takes time to say it was only a working hypothesis. Are you sure Mr Zapatero?. Do not you remember?.
To continue, Mr Zapatero did not believe him.
0 comments:
Post a Comment