few days ago the government of Spain has announced its intention to propose a reform of the pension system, little has materialized in this regard, only that the retirement age would be 67 years and that the implementation of the scheme would progressively from 2013.
Fits
thousand reflections, I think anyone is aware that only last a few weeks the government is fully filled his mouth saying the system was guaranteed to go to defend their proposal based on the need to ensure the benefits from 2020 and to appeal to their sense of responsibility, a responsibility that seemed to have no 30 days ago. Do not try to assess the need for reforms that are likely to be necessary, but if you intend them to reflect on the safety with which they have handled and managed our finances, for all because we can not forget that the pension system and health has much to do with the management to be performed.
UdS Do you think it has been managed the system properly?.
may be useful to reflect on the following questions: How
been allowed in many cases early retirement after 48 years?.
If gentlemen, in our country over the past 15 years has promoted the expulsion of the labor market of hundreds of thousands of workers under 60 years at great cost in lost talent and the corresponding financial resources to fund that expulsion, together with the pension that in most cases it has been several years before 65.
But also the different governments have encouraged early retirement law is enough to recall, among other figures of the replacement contract, under which a worker is allowed to access the early retirement provided that the post be filled by another worker. How
certain groups, such as read deputies are entitled to retirement pension with just a few years of contribution?.
It seems that we are again at 2 Spains, citizens with rights first and second they have rights that governments have let them.
need not go into other considerations but suffice remember the trend that we have as citizens to try to get part of the public where there is the paragon of rights and obligations not always.
According to the criteria that are handled in this blog, it seems necessary to show that the finances are not managed with the margin of safety required, certainly not the pension system or the whole of government . Beyond the need for solidarity, necessary for a pensions sitema seems clear that as much as is claimed must not forget, I think we need serious and especially "freedom of choice to citizens." Freedom is not limited to elect representatives every 4 years, on the contrary need to exercise as each affects the pension directly and I'm sure it does.
I will raise a series of questions to think about it:
1. Where is the solidarity when some citizens are allowed access to a benefit with 20 years of contributions while others are required 35?.
2. How can you treat differently from 2 people who have contributed 35 years to have a misfortune of being expelled from the labor market with 55 years?.
3. Why are the last 15 years that weight to determine the benefit?.
you do not believe that the reason for the need that now sells for reform is the result of:
a) Lack of courage and ability to really establish a rational and coherent system.
b) wastage of funds due to lack of proper management.
UDS Do you think that governments are managing well SPAIN resources available?.
I wonder if you can not manage more rigorously, eg
- Plans as we just saw and have been to spend 8000 Mill / Euros to the voice of now, plans have consisted of most cases to change the width of sidewalks, the paving of streets, etc.
- duplication of responsibilities in various Administrations in.
- Many enterprises within the various administrations that are managing expenditure and non-value, as Examples include TVs of different communities and gradually try to introduce too local.
- In short, do we need more than 3 million employees (state, regional, local) to the services provided by this country?. Meanwhile
think the solution to the problems coming for patching a pension system lacks rationality, while we are not aware that waste can not devote resources to create jobs that allow young people in this country (no doubt with training and skills) to develop its project of life that seems not entitled.
I will give, in my p. v, which should be some guidelines (features to look) of a real reform that would allow some degree of equity and solidarity, a solidarity which should be completed with funding from taxes (read: no new taxes but better management of existing ones) .
1) First of all workers' freedom to decide when to start working and when they decide to end their working lives.
2) Provision retirement taking into account all contributions made and the time in which you want to start to perceive, this is in terms of life expectancy of the moment in which it will begin to perceive. I wonder why can not decide to start working at age 20 and quit at 58?. If the worker then has a life expectancy of 22 years and prefer to have eg. a monthly pension of 1,300 Euros instead of 1,900, what is the reason for not accepting it?.
3) It is possible that certain groups have to have special conditions for the type of work they do and could study some correction factors when periods and calculations of the pension.
I have the perception that the political class in general and our country in particular, is fleeing the freedom of citizens and in general make a machine to control and irrational spending.
0 comments:
Post a Comment